Read a quip by a fella who sincerely (well maybe a feigned sincerity) asked if historians of the Christian persuasion can possibly be honest by promoting the biblical narrative. Here it is.
Question: Can a biblical historian be thoroughly objective as a Christian and retain their integrity?
Ha! Perhaps this is the better question:
Does the atheist have an ounce of INTEGRITY when sitting in judgement of God and scripture?
Thus the question posed regarding historians is riddled with contradiction, and further reveals the deceptive traits in promoting ‘errors’ in the only reliable historical account of man’s origins, his progress, his regress, and his future.
But there is more. It is not so much that the atheist has issues with Joshua, trumpets, King Darius, Daniel, dreams, Mordecai, Haman, Xerxes, Esther, the hanging gardens, the Red Sea, The Tigris and Euphrates, Seth, Enos, Methuselah, King David, Shem, Japheth, Ararat, (all historical…
View original post 407 more words
For Such A Time As This 
Tkx for calling attention to this
LikeLike